Dame Elisabeth and the Frinks  | The Smith and Eley Families  |The Rowlinson Family | The Day Family

9. Dame Elisabeth and the Frinks
DIANE SPEAKMAN

(Continued)
She was never interested in delicate things, feeling women were too soft, didn't fit into her pattern. She was always obsessed with shapes ­ 'It's . . . the shape of an animal that interests me and the way it moves . . . I want to catch a moment of something before it goes', and she liked the 'subtle combination of sensuality and strength with vulnerability' of the male. Edwin Mullins has said, in the introduction to his book, The Art of Elisabeth Frink (1972): 'The main artery of Elisabeth Frink's work is the theme of the dominant male. The male is not always a man. He is frequently a beast, or a bird, or something between the two . . . He is aggressive, mindless, physical and predatory.' He goes on to assert that her work is a female view of maleness. But Frink herself believed that in art there were no sexes: 'There's no such word as sculptress. If you're a woman, you must be prepared to do everything.'


Dame Elisabeth Frink in her studio
(by permission of the Executors of the Elisabeth Frink Estate; photo Peter Kinnear)

Elisabeth was married three times. First, in 1955, to Michel Jammet, son of the Dublin restaurateur and himself an architect, by whom she had her artist son, Lin, in 1958. She later divorced Jammet (who died in 1972) and married Ted Pool in 1964, living with him in Clarendon Drive, Putney, and later in France, until their marriage broke down in 1972. By 1965 he was detectable in her helmeted series Soldiers. The artist thought the soldiers' heads and their later development, Goggle Heads, were the only political statement in her work.

Taken from pages 58 -59

< previous | next >

© Little Thurlow 2000 Project
info@littlethurlow.org